SIGIR '26  •  July 20–24, 2026  •  Melbourne, VIC, Australia
PAPER arxiv.org/html/2605.26424v1

Uniboost: Global Coordination with Value Alignment
for Fair and Efficient Traffic Allocation

Ge Fan, Nan Zhao, Kai Meng, Cong Luo, Yang Fu, Huiping Chu, Jialin Liu, Yuning Jiang, Bo Zheng
Taobao & Tmall Group of Alibaba  |  Hangzhou & Beijing, China
1 Background & Challenges

The Blending stage merges candidates from diverse sources (ads, organic, cold-start) and allocates traffic via weighting mechanisms. Existing approaches suffer from three core problems:

Score Inflation — accumulated PID and Boost weights make scores explode, losing physical semantics and interpretability
Plan Coupling — multiple allocation plans (guaranteed delivery, cold-start, promotions) interfere with each other, making optimisation intractable
No Attribution — individual plan cost and contribution cannot be isolated, blocking data-driven decisions

Our Solutions

1
Posterior Value Alignment — identify Effective Completion Rate as anchor metric, turning abstract scores into business-semantic values without altering ranking order
2
Unified Boosting Paradigm — independent linear boosting with bias, covering existing schemes while keeping every weighted score interpretable
3
Precise Attribution — linear aggregation quantifies each plan's contribution, enabling ROI-based macro guidance
2 Uniboost Method
2.1  Value Alignment

Raw scores y′v lack business semantics. We map them into anchor-metric space:

yv = y′v · μanchor ⁄ μscore Eq. 1 — calibrates scores to expected Effective Completion Rate
2.2  Independent Boosting
sp,v = 𝟙p(v) · (wp · yv + bp) Eq. 2 — each plan computed independently with learnable wp, bp
2.3  Linear Aggregation
rv = yv + ∑p∈S sp,v Eq. 3 — additive composition ensures full attributability
Backward Compatibility

wad=0, bad=PID → original guaranteed delivery is preserved.
wcs≠0, bcs=0 → conventional cold-start Boost. Unified with zero disruption.

Uniboost system overview

Figure 1: Uniboost system overview — candidates flow through Model Scoring → Value Alignment → Independent Boost Calculation → Linear Aggregation → Exposure. A near-line/offline subsystem performs Distribution Tracking and ROI Analysis for closed-loop optimisation.

3 Experiments & Results

Large-scale online A/B test on Taobao Content Feeds. Control: original pipeline (align after weighting). Treatment: Uniboost with Effective Completion as anchor.

+1.69%
VV
(impressions)
+3.07%
Valued VV
(played > 3s)
+0.65%
Duration
(total watch time)
+2.54%
Valued Score
(composite UX)

RQ1  Micro-level Efficiency

Ad boosting score
−92.21%
Video boosting score
−95.81%

Weighting magnitudes drop by more than 90% while exposure shares stay stable — decoupled plans do not sacrifice delivery.

Insight: shrinking weighted-score magnitude removes unintended cross-plan interference, yielding measurably more efficient micro-level allocation.

RQ2  Macro-level Guidance

ROI-based offline analysis quantifies each plan's cost against its benefit:

ROIVVp = ΔVVp ⁄ Costp

Plan-A was flagged as lowest ROI; the ablation confirms it:

SettingVVValued VVDurationValued Score
w/o Plan-A+0.95%+2.83%+3.49%+4.13%
Insight: per-plan cost/benefit dashboards turn traffic governance into a data-driven loop, accelerating strategy iteration.
4 RQ3  Anchor Metric Selection

A usable anchor must satisfy two principles. We screen six posterior metrics against the blending score (x axis: model score; each panel shares the same plot geometry):

Principle 1  Stability

Values stay uniformly distributed across every model-score interval — no score-dependent divergence or bias.

Principle 2  Low Calibration Error

Calibration error remains low and flat across all score intervals, so alignment introduces no systematic bias.

Eff. Completion
Eff. Completion y: 0 – 1.0  ·  stable, well spread
~ Duration
Duration y: 0 – 0.9  ·  long-tail divergence
~ Click
Click y: 0 – 1.2×10⁻⁴  ·  long-tail divergence
Interaction
Interaction y: 0 – 0.18  ·  sparse & volatile
Slide
Slide y: 0 – 0.9  ·  sparse & volatile
Buy
Buy y: 0 – 0.23  ·  sparse & volatile

All panels: x axis = blending score, y axis = posterior metric value (range noted per panel).

Insight: Interaction, Slide and Buy are too sparse and volatile; Click and Duration diverge in the long-tail (high-score) region. Only Effective Completion satisfies both principles, making it a robust and cheaply obtainable anchor for content recommendation pipelines.